Apparently2.00:1 is called "Univisium". 16:9 (1.77:1) is common for TV shows but films tend to have wider aspects - 1.85:1 or 2.35:1. Because they're used for films, they have a "cinematic" feeling. The implication with this 2:1 size is that it will be a compromise that all films and TV shows can use so that we don't have dozens of different
Tworeasons: 16:9 is a compromise between 4:3 and 2.35:1. Material formatted in either format will occupy roughly the same amount of area on a 16:9 screen. 16:9 is approximately 1.78:1. Most movies produced since the 1950’s, when the movie studios began producing widescreen features to try to compete with television (which was seriously
Cinemasare set up for 1.85:1 projection, as is the workflow and the cameras designed for cinema productions. 16:9 can have slight pillars on either side if you're going through the full 2k DCP workflow,. If you don't want to shoot 1.85, no one is stopping you shooting 16:9, many low budget films are shot using that aspect ratio.
Asa 2.35:1 Display: 16.50% larger diagonal 35.72% larger area: 14.16% smaller diagonal 26.32% smaller area : Share your Comparison: 43 inch 16x9 display vs 35 inch 21x9 display
Ok so you place the screen so that one screen is facing you and the other is to the side. But this is often equally awkward whereas a 32:9 curved screen is pretty comfy. Samsung's superultrawides also allow for Picture by Picture mode splitting if you want. It supports both 21:9 ultrawide + 11:9 and 2x 16:9 setups.
Asa 16:9 Display: 13.70% smaller diagonal 25.52% smaller area: 15.87% larger diagonal 34.27% larger area: As a 2.35:1 Display: 13.27% larger diagonal 28.30% larger area: 11.72% smaller diagonal 22.06% smaller area : Share your Comparison: 29 inch 21x9 display vs 27 inch 16x9 display
8cONlf. 388 391 121 142 723 311 439 625
2.35 1 vs 16 9
